The following principles frame the publications, analyses, and applications of the Ethical Council of Humanity. They are not about opinion building but about clarifying causes, effects, and responsibilities.
Choose the language in which the principles are already available:
Principles reveal recurring logics that operate independently of political systems or technologies.
Principles describe recurring logics that appear independently of political systems, institutions, or technologies. They reveal why certain patterns persist and under which conditions change becomes possible.
Responsibility is shifted away from the system even though the architecture generates the harm.
Systemic guilt reversal is the structural pattern in which systems hide their own causes and shift responsibility onto individuals, groups, or external factors while leaving the architecture untouched.
Indicator: Problems are named, but causes are not.
Administrative systems optimise consequences; responsible systems redesign causes.
Administration manages consequences; responsibility changes causes. Administrative systems react, optimise, and regulate within existing frameworks. Responsible systems design, prevent, and integrate feedback into their architecture.
Tools amplify the inner logic of the operator; without inner work they accelerate decline.
Technology always amplifies a system’s prevailing internal logic. Without a shift in consciousness it accelerates distortions, stabilises destructive structures, and replaces insight with efficiency.
Causal healing redesigns the system so that repeating damage becomes unnecessary.
Repair logic removes symptoms, accepts repetition, and plans ongoing interventions. Causal healing changes the system architecture itself, makes permanent repairs obsolete, and drastically reduces the load.
The principles apply across administration, economy, technology, health, and community life.
These principles act across administration, economy, technology, health, and social organisation. They are deepened in the areas of Works and Analyses and become concrete in future applications.
Band III shows authorities that dissolve every response chain – silence becomes an instrument of power.
When administrations keep postponing deadlines, callbacks, and responsibilities, administrative apnea emerges: the structure keeps its shape but no air reaches the people. Decisions are deferred, accountability is parked, and those affected experience the documented non-response as a weapon.
Effect: Even urgent cases are treated like statistics. The state no longer responds as a partner but as an empty chamber.
Band III documents text modules that mimic empathy while hiding the absence of action.
Case files reveal language shells used like rituals: “We are processing your request”, “Please understand our delay”, “The matter is under review”. They create ten seconds of calm yet trigger no action. Language loses truthfulness and becomes administrative fog.
Consequence: People who depend on a binding answer are lulled by formulas and lose trust in every official statement.
Institutions collect signals but no longer cultivate the inner space required to respond truthfully.
Loss of resonance means that a state still receives signals (petitions, lawsuits, evidence) but lacks the inner field to respond. Communication becomes one-way traffic: the state listens without replying because its energy is tied up in self-preservation.
Impact: Legitimacy erodes the moment lived experience and constitutional promise drift apart.
Band III illustrates how empathy is allowed rhetorically while execution remains detached and harmful.
Psychological decoupling describes a state in which staff may express empathy yet hold no mandate to act. The system splits perception from execution and renders violence “procedurally necessary”.
Result: Staff members burn out, affected people experience measured coldness, and both sides lose the ability to assume full responsibility.
Status: 14 Dec 2025